Aside from that, I've got 8GB ram, a ~750GB Oracle instance running, and
4GB SHMMAX attatched to some Copper FC1 disks and using QLA2200's.
It's been very happy since rc1. Anyway, it's worth a shot. As soon as
2.4.19 is "done" this box will go into production as soon as this RC2 VM
stuff is cleared up.
On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 15:17, anton wilson wrote:
> On Friday 19 July 2002 03:54 pm, J Sloan wrote:
> > Use 2.4-aa, 2.4-ac or 2.4-redhat kernel
> > and you get the O(1) secheduler at
> > no extra cost -
> >
>
>
> > Joe
>
>
> I'm actually worried not about just the O(1) scheduler but if these patches
> will be incorporating the O(1) bug fixes such as the serious one in
> balance_load where curr->next was used instead of current->prev. Also, I need
> to use a patch that won't tamper with the usb implementation because I'd have
> to update our current usb driver to fit into the new system, and I'm getting
> flack about wasting time trying to update that thing already . . . So if you
> tell me no, I can go tell my boss I have to update the usb driver.
>
>
> Anton
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- Austin Gonyou <austin@digitalroadkill.net> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/