success with atomic kmap patches

Dave Hansen (haveblue@us.ibm.com)
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 19:15:48 -0700


I was using a little script to warm up my file cache for Specweb runs
when Martin Bligh said that it might be a good test of your kmap
patches. I ran 8 greps in parallel (1-per-cpu) through a 10-gigabyte
Specweb file set which is on a RAID array. The RAID is how I can do a
cold run in 3 minutes 30 sec :). Each grep works on a disjoint set of
data.

Here's a run with the cache already warm:
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrepwarm-2.5.26+lm+kmapfun-07-18-2002-18.24.38/
You'll probably only care about greptime.total, and lockstat. The
network stuff is cruft from when I actually run Specweb.

Here's a cold cache run:
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-cold-2.5.26+lm+kmapfun-07-18-2002-18.25.55/

Here are warm and cold, without the kmap patches
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-cold-2.5.26+lm-07-18-2002-18.46.27/
http://www.sr71.net/~specweb99/run-pgrep-warm-2.5.26+lm-07-18-2002-18.56.09/

I would give you oprofile data, but it appears that NMIs wreak havoc
on a certain vendor's hardware. When oprofile is compiled in, my box
gets quite unstable.

-- 
Dave Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/