Re: [PATCH] preemptive kernel for 2.4.19-rc1-ac3

Robert Love (rml@tech9.net)
15 Jul 2002 09:36:06 -0700

On Sun, 2002-07-14 at 17:43, Ed Tomlinson wrote:

> If you build with preempt=N (for the scheduler stuff) the link of the
> kernel fails.

What, someone does not use preemption? 8)

An updated patch is available:

http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/preempt-kernel/v2.4/preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-rc1-ac3-2.patch

I missed the definition of the new spin_unlock_no_resched from 2.5 in
the !CONFIG_PREEMPT case. Thank you for pointing this out.

Robert Love

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/