> My concern is only the fact that it would be easier in my opinnion to
> start off with ide-scsi and make it *independant* from the SCSI code or
> device handling by separating commonly used code for MMC_ handling out
> of SCSI in a kind of library (that is it) and not a common "layer" (this
> could be a second step).
What about some kind of
retval_t mmc_to_hostcmd(host, cmd, ...);
response_t response_to_mmc(host, ...);
?
Regards,
Thunder
-- (Use http://www.ebb.org/ungeek if you can't decode) ------BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Version: 3.12 GCS/E/G/S/AT d- s++:-- a? C++$ ULAVHI++++$ P++$ L++++(+++++)$ E W-$ N--- o? K? w-- O- M V$ PS+ PE- Y- PGP+ t+ 5+ X+ R- !tv b++ DI? !D G e++++ h* r--- y- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/