Re: IDE/ATAPI in 2.5

Anton Altaparmakov (aia21@cantab.net)
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:39:19 +0100

At 14:24 14/07/02, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>[...] In addition, if the drive would support DAE via some non-standard
>interface [...]. The DAE quality would be lousy [...].

This is a very presumptuous statement! You cannot assume that an
alternative interface would be of lousy quality. Maybe it is a million
times better? The current one (at least as some drives implement it on the
drive side) can be of very, very poor quality indeed.

Note: I am not saying that there is an alternative interface or anything
like that... just that your statement is fallacious.

Best regards,

Anton

-- 
   "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown

-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cantab.net> (replace at with @)
Linux NTFS Maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.openprojects.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/