Re: 64 bit netdev stats counter

[Alan Cox]

On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 22:58, David S. Miller wrote:
> 32-bit values aren't atomic either, what is the issue?
> We don't use atomic_t ops on these counters so they aren't
> guarenteed in any way right now even.  GCC is going to
> output "incl MEM" or similar for net_stats->counter++, since
> it lacks the 'lock;' prefix it is not atomic.

The behaviour is quite different though. On a 32bit counter the worst we
do is lose a few counts. On a 64bit one on 32bit cpus its quite likely
gcc will output

		increment low 32bit
		if zero
			increment high

Which means we can rapidly get 2^32 out of sync