To be honest - why keep ide-[cd,floppy,tape] when they can be almost
completely replaced with ide-scsi? I know about only few cdrom devices
that are broken (== not ATAPI compliant) but can be used with
workarounds in the current ide-cd driver. OTOH many users do already
need ide-scsi to access cd recorders and similar hardware, so they would
benefit much more from having ide-scsi as default than few users of
broken "atapi" drives.
Other operating systems did switch to constitent (scsi-based) way of
accessing all kinds of removable media drivers. Why does Linux have to
keep a kludge, written years ago without having a good concept?
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
-- Ich glaube nicht, daß man dieses Stück in Software umgesetzte Scheiße über- haupt mieser machen kann, als es sowieso schon ist. Das dürfte das einzige Programm sein, das vom Verhalten und seinen Anwendern her schlimmer als XP auf einem Amiga ist. - Manuel Richardt in ka.talk ueber Outlook Express- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/