Re: [PATCH] Shift BKL into ->statfs()

Matthew Wilcox (willy@debian.org)
Wed, 3 Jul 2002 13:28:48 +0100

On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 12:57:56AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> All ->statfs() implementations have been modified to take the BKL,
> except for the following:
>
> - those that don't reference any external mutable data:

... also adfs_statfs,

> - those that already have their own locking:

... also affs_statfs, bfs_statfs, ext3_statfs, hfs_statfs, jffs2_statfs,
jfs_statfs

I think ufs_statfs needs lock_super() due to its handling of fragments.

qnx4 looks terribly broken for read-write anyway... probably just keep the
lock_kernel / unlock_kernel around the call to qnx4_count_free_blocks().

I haven't audited coda, hpfs, jffs, nfs, smbfs & udf.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/