> On 2 Jul 2002, Robert Love wrote:
>
> > As I am the one doing these 2.4 patches, I will invariably be asked
> > whether I intend for the O(1) scheduler to be merged into 2.4. The
> > answer is a strong NO.
>
> Of course, I think you know that you will also asked WHY?
Because I do not think 2.4 should be a breeding ground for every new
feature that wets someone's appetite. It should be stable and trusted
before anything else. We also have to worry about architecture
support. Let the scheduler be 2.5's thing.
> Also if I can immagine your reasons, as similar discussions have been
> done for preemption patch and so on, and as I said at the times, I Agree.
I do not think preemption should go in 2.4, either. It too is a 2.5
thing.
> 2.5 is the place for this new and cool stuff.
Agreed.
Robert Love
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/