The problem is definitely in the file lock accounting. Since it's
effectively useless anyway, taking it out seems to be the right thing
to do for 2.4. Here's a patch to do that:
diff -urNX dontdiff linux-2418/fs/locks.c linux-2418-acct/fs/locks.c
--- linux-2418/fs/locks.c Thu Oct 11 08:52:18 2001
+++ linux-2418-acct/fs/locks.c Mon Jul 1 16:23:36 2002
@@ -134,15 +134,9 @@
static kmem_cache_t *filelock_cache;
/* Allocate an empty lock structure. */
-static struct file_lock *locks_alloc_lock(int account)
+static struct file_lock *locks_alloc_lock(void)
{
- struct file_lock *fl;
- if (account && current->locks >= current->rlim[RLIMIT_LOCKS].rlim_cur)
- return NULL;
- fl = kmem_cache_alloc(filelock_cache, SLAB_KERNEL);
- if (fl)
- current->locks++;
- return fl;
+ return kmem_cache_alloc(filelock_cache, SLAB_KERNEL);
}
/* Free a lock which is not in use. */
@@ -152,7 +146,6 @@
BUG();
return;
}
- current->locks--;
if (waitqueue_active(&fl->fl_wait))
panic("Attempting to free lock with active wait queue");
@@ -219,7 +212,7 @@
/* Fill in a file_lock structure with an appropriate FLOCK lock. */
static struct file_lock *flock_make_lock(struct file *filp, unsigned int type)
{
- struct file_lock *fl = locks_alloc_lock(1);
+ struct file_lock *fl = locks_alloc_lock();
if (fl == NULL)
return NULL;
@@ -348,7 +341,7 @@
/* Allocate a file_lock initialised to this type of lease */
static int lease_alloc(struct file *filp, int type, struct file_lock **flp)
{
- struct file_lock *fl = locks_alloc_lock(1);
+ struct file_lock *fl = locks_alloc_lock();
if (fl == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -712,7 +705,7 @@
size_t count)
{
struct file_lock *fl;
- struct file_lock *new_fl = locks_alloc_lock(0);
+ struct file_lock *new_fl = locks_alloc_lock();
int error;
if (new_fl == NULL)
@@ -872,8 +865,8 @@
* We may need two file_lock structures for this operation,
* so we get them in advance to avoid races.
*/
- new_fl = locks_alloc_lock(0);
- new_fl2 = locks_alloc_lock(0);
+ new_fl = locks_alloc_lock();
+ new_fl2 = locks_alloc_lock();
error = -ENOLCK; /* "no luck" */
if (!(new_fl && new_fl2))
goto out_nolock;
@@ -1426,7 +1419,7 @@
int fcntl_setlk(unsigned int fd, unsigned int cmd, struct flock *l)
{
struct file *filp;
- struct file_lock *file_lock = locks_alloc_lock(0);
+ struct file_lock *file_lock = locks_alloc_lock();
struct flock flock;
struct inode *inode;
int error;
@@ -1582,7 +1575,7 @@
int fcntl_setlk64(unsigned int fd, unsigned int cmd, struct flock64 *l)
{
struct file *filp;
- struct file_lock *file_lock = locks_alloc_lock(0);
+ struct file_lock *file_lock = locks_alloc_lock();
struct flock64 flock;
struct inode *inode;
int error;
-- Revolutions do not require corporate support. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/