Re: [PATCH] /proc/scsi/map

[Patrick Mochel]

> > That's why I think a "non-physical" tree (not under $DRIVERFS/root) is more
> > sensible in such cases.  Which is not to say it's without additional issues
> > (like how to establish/maintain driver linkages that are DAGs not single
> > parent trees) but it wouldn't require drivers to dig as deeply into lower
> > levels of their stack.  (And some network interfaces might well live in
> > such a non-physical tree, not just iSCSI...)
> > 
> 
> I am in complete agreement, from my little view of where driverfs
> currently stands a non-physical tree is going to have to happen sooner
> or later,  why not now?  

No. The physical hierarchy in driverfs is meant to be as accurate as 
possible. Yes, it's idealistic, and at some point we might have to make a 
bit of an exception. But, I refuse to break that model yet. 

	-pat