Is this being picked up by the kernel maintainers?
(How can I check if such patch is being picked up?
Is there an up-to-date bleeding edge patched source tree?)
As someone who has been bitten a few times with
similar problems (including "reset storm")
related to SCSI error handler deficiencies,
I would like to see the patch go in.
[Sorry, I am so scared these days to connect
an old Seagate drive that is known to cause trouble
due to a media error or two
to my current PC.
When it killed linux 2.3.1xx, solaris
7 kept on handling the situation gracefully
to my dismay/surprise. From what I understand,
the situation has not improved very much practically,
and this post is one of the leading improvements
to error handler.
Surely I hope the 2.5 kernel series would
have revampled SCSI subsystem with better readability
so that more people including me can understand the
code and contribute. I tried back when I noticed the
problem (and much earlier with other SCSI problems)
but the twisted code kept me from understanding the
scsi subsystem completely.
From: Borsenkow Andrej <Andrej.Borsenkow@mow.siemens.ru>
> >
> > It looks like a media went corrupted so one expects some reasonable
> > error message. What happens is I get endless loop in SCSI error recovery
> > thread. The only way to clear up situation is to reboot
> >
> > That is the normal situation. I have never seen the SCSI error handler
> > do anything else but bring down the system. Commenting it out
> > really increases the stability of Linux (on my hardware).
> >
>
> MAINTAINERS:
>
> SCSI SUBSYSTEM
> L: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> S: Unmaintained
>
> Oh, well ...
>
>
> > Hmm. It is clear what happens.
> > You are in scsi_error.c:scsi_send_eh_cmnd() and send a command,
> > the return status is NEEDS_RETRY, and the same command is sent again. Etc.
> >
> > Now retrying is evil, and trying more than three times almost always
> > stupid, so if you add in this function
> >
> > int retry_count = 0;
> >
> > and
> >
> > retry:
> > if (++retry_count > 3) {
> > SCpnt->eh_state = FAILED;
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > that would surely be an improvement locally.
> > Globally one wonders: there is a retry count already - why isn't it
> > honoured by everybody involved? (But it isnt - it is only used in
> > scsi_decide_disposition().)
> >
>
> Which actually looks like an oversight ... and comments in unjam_host
> loop even indicate this must be used.
>
> Anyway, returning FAILED does not look right here. As long as I
> understand what happens, FAILED means hard error (like failing to
> communicate with device) while here we have more or less "soft" error.
> So I decided to copy relevant bits from scsi_decide_disposition into
> scsi_eh_completed_normally which resulted in pretty nice overall error
> handling:
>
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: Activating command for device 4 (1)
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: Doing sd request, dev = 0x804, block = 944448
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: sda : real dev = /dev/0, block = 944480
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: sda : reading 8/8 512 byte blocks.
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 6000 (d2a13964)
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: scsi_dispatch_cmnd (host = 0, channel = 0, target = 4, command = cfe5a058, buffer = ca4d4000,
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: bufflen = 4096, done = d2813b84)
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: queuecommand : routine at d2a38292
> Jun 9 19:30:45 localhost kernel: leaving scsi_dispatch_cmnd()
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Clearing timer for command cfe5a000 1
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Command failed cfe5a000 2 active=1 busy=1 failed=0
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: bh08:04: old sense key None
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Non-extended sense class 0 code 0x0
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Waking error handler thread (-1)
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Error handler waking up
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: scsi_unjam_host: Checking to see if we need to request sense
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: scsi_unjam_host: Requesting sense for 4
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 1000 (d2a13af8)
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: In eh_done cfe5a000 result:0
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: send_eh_cmnd: cfe5a000 eh_state:2002
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: scsi_send_eh_cmnd: scsi_eh_completed_normally 2002
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Sense requested for cfe5a000 - result 2
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Info fld=0xe6960, Current bh08:04: sense key Medium Error
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Additional sense indicates Address mark not found for data field
> Jun 9 19:30:47 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 6000 (d2a13af8)
> Jun 9 19:30:49 localhost kernel: In eh_done cfe5a000 result:2
> Jun 9 19:30:49 localhost kernel: send_eh_cmnd: cfe5a000 eh_state:2002
> Jun 9 19:30:49 localhost kernel: scsi_send_eh_cmnd: scsi_eh_completed_normally 2001
> Jun 9 19:30:49 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 6000 (d2a13af8)
> Jun 9 19:30:51 localhost kernel: In eh_done cfe5a000 result:2
> Jun 9 19:30:51 localhost kernel: send_eh_cmnd: cfe5a000 eh_state:2002
> Jun 9 19:30:51 localhost kernel: scsi_send_eh_cmnd: scsi_eh_completed_normally 2001
> Jun 9 19:30:51 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 6000 (d2a13af8)
> Jun 9 19:30:53 localhost kernel: In eh_done cfe5a000 result:2
> Jun 9 19:30:53 localhost kernel: send_eh_cmnd: cfe5a000 eh_state:2002
> Jun 9 19:30:53 localhost kernel: scsi_send_eh_cmnd: scsi_eh_completed_normally 2001
> Jun 9 19:30:53 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 6000 (d2a13af8)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: In eh_done cfe5a000 result:2
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: send_eh_cmnd: cfe5a000 eh_state:2002
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: scsi_send_eh_cmnd: scsi_eh_completed_normally 2002
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Total of 0+0 commands on 0 devices require eh work
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 100 (d2a13af8)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Clearing timer for command cfe5a000 1
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: scsi_error.c: Waking up host to restart
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Error handler sleeping
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Command finished 1 0 0x2
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Notifying upper driver of completion for device 4 8000002
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: sda : rw_intr(0, 8000002 [f0 3])
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: scsi0: ERROR on channel 0, id 4, lun 0, CDB: Read (10) 00 00 0e 69 60 00 00 08 00
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Info fld=0xe6960, Current sd08:04: sense key Medium Error
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Additional sense indicates Address mark not found for data field
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: I/O error: dev 08:04, sector 944448
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Deactivating command for device 4 (active=0, failed=0)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Open returning 1
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Trying ioctl with scsi command 30
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: scsi_do_req (host = 0, channel = 0 target = 4, buffer =00000000, bufflen = 0, done = d2a0f088, timeout = 1000, retries = 5)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: command : 1e 00 00 00 00 00
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Activating command for device 4 (1)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Leaving scsi_init_cmd_from_req()
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Adding timer for command cfe5a000 at 1000 (d2a13964)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: scsi_dispatch_cmnd (host = 0, channel = 0, target = 4, command = cfe5a058, buffer = 00000000,
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: bufflen = 0, done = d2a0f088)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: queuecommand : routine at d2a38292
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: leaving scsi_dispatch_cmnd()
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Leaving scsi_do_req()
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Clearing timer for command cfe5a000 1
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Command finished 1 0 0x0
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Notifying upper driver of completion for device 4 0
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Deactivating command for device 4 (active=0, failed=0)
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: Ioctl returned 0x0
> Jun 9 19:30:55 localhost kernel: IOCTL Releasing command
>
>
> > Where did we get this NEEDS_RETRY in the first place?
> > Well, scsi_check_sense() will return NEEDS_RETRY for MEDIUM_ERROR.
> > (Bad: the hardware also did retry many times already; it is usually very
> > counterproductive to keep on hitting the same bad spot on the media.)
> >
>
> I do not dare to touch it. Whoever wrote the code must have some reasons
> behind. Still, the obvious patch the shuts at least this code path
> follows.
>
> -andrej
>
> > There are also other code paths that will loop, but this one
> > looks most likely here.
> >
> > Andries
> >
>
> --- linux-2.4.18-18mdk/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c.scsi-eh-timeout Thu May 30 16:22:37 2002
> +++ linux-2.4.18-18mdk/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c Sun Jun 9 19:18:11 2002
> @@ -1100,6 +1100,8 @@
> */
> STATIC int scsi_eh_completed_normally(Scsi_Cmnd * SCpnt)
> {
> + int rtn;
> +
> /*
> * First check the host byte, to see if there is anything in there
> * that would indicate what we need to do.
> @@ -1113,14 +1115,18 @@
> * otherwise we just flag it as success.
> */
> SCpnt->flags &= ~IS_RESETTING;
> - return NEEDS_RETRY;
> + goto maybe_retry;
> }
> /*
> * Rats. We are already in the error handler, so we now get to try
> * and figure out what to do next. If the sense is valid, we have
> * a pretty good idea of what to do. If not, we mark it as failed.
> */
> - return scsi_check_sense(SCpnt);
> + rtn = scsi_check_sense(SCpnt);
> + if (rtn == NEEDS_RETRY) {
> + goto maybe_retry;
> + }
> + return rtn;
> }
> if (host_byte(SCpnt->result) != DID_OK) {
> return FAILED;
> @@ -1139,7 +1145,11 @@
> case COMMAND_TERMINATED:
> return SUCCESS;
> case CHECK_CONDITION:
> - return scsi_check_sense(SCpnt);
> + rtn = scsi_check_sense(SCpnt);
> + if (rtn == NEEDS_RETRY) {
> + goto maybe_retry;
> + }
> + return rtn;
> case CONDITION_GOOD:
> case INTERMEDIATE_GOOD:
> case INTERMEDIATE_C_GOOD:
> @@ -1154,6 +1164,17 @@
> return FAILED;
> }
> return FAILED;
> +
> + maybe_retry:
> +
> + if ((++SCpnt->retries) < SCpnt->allowed) {
> + return NEEDS_RETRY;
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * No more retries - report this one back to upper level.
> + */
> + return SUCCESS;
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> -
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/