There is indeed Documentation/vm/locking - but I wouldn't trust it
for an instant! These details change from time to time, Documentation
is likely to lag far behind, the source must be your reference.
There is also a very useful "NOTE:" in the 2.4 mm/filemap.c, which did
get updated in 2.4.14; but that doesn't mention the page_table_lock.
> Does do_swap_page() (in mm/memory.c) release mm->page_table_lock because
> one cannot hold this lock when lookup_swap_cache() ... __find_get_page()
> takes pagecache_lock ? Or does it do only for shorten the locked path ?
> (Can I keep mm->page_table_lock when I call __find_get_page() ?)
I deduce from "pagecache_lock" that you're asking about current 2.4,
though I think an equivalent answer would apply to current 2.5. It does
it to shorten the locked path, you could hold mm->page_table_lock when
you call __find_get_page(): a precedent is where do_swap_page() holds
page_table_lock while calling remove_exclusive_swap_page(), which may
take the pagecache_lock.
But tomorrow... who knows?
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/