>On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 20:54, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>
>
>>>Well, my concern here is for the pte_chain_lock() / pte_chain_unlock()
>>>bits. Teaching them about preemption should be all that's needed there.
>>>
>>>
>
>On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 11:40:39AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
>
>
>>The newest patch should have the code I shared with you. So we are OK,
>>no?
>>
>>
>
>That should cover it, yes. The only questions left are if the user is
>using the right version and where the bug is.
>
>Cheers,
>Bill
>
>
The user (oops, that is me) was using
preempt-kernel-rml-2.4.19-pre10-ac2-1, by the time of the report.
Cheers,
Alexandre
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/