RE: driverfs is not for everything! (was: [PATCH] /proc/scsi/map

[Grover, Andrew]

> From: James Bottomley [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> [e-mail] said:
> > If a device can be accessed by multiple machines concurrently, it
> > should not be in driverfs. 
> 
> On that argument, we'll eliminate almost all Fibre Channel devices!
> 
> I think the qualification for appearing in driverfs is 
> actually possessing a 
> driver.  Therefore, we accept FC and iSCSI.  Things which appear as 
> FileSystems are debatable, but not anything which has a real 
> device driver.

OK that makes sense.

Regards -- Andy