On Tue, 2002-06-04 08:50:11 -0700, Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
wrote in message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206040821100.654-100000@geena.pdx.osdl.net=
>:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
> > From: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> > Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 14:27:27 +1000
[Order of grouped init calls]
> early_arch
> mem
> subsys
> arch
> fs
> device
> late
Just a dumb ass question: We're currently dealing with grouped init
calls. Why don't we simply give them numbers like we do in
/etc/rc<X>.d/S<YZ>startme.sh? That would possibly give an easier
mechanism of keeping all those init calls in a sane order!?
MfG, JBG
--=20
Jan-Benedict Glaw . jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481
-- New APT-Proxy written in shell script --
http://lug-owl.de/~jbglaw/software/ap2/
--rd/3IrB17klb+Ksj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9Ff9hHb1edYOZ4bsRAqsJAJ0axRgyg7XG9AoUXtVl6TV73gF6zQCffY6F
+hyPgokKAZlTK7xwUNs7AYo=
=bIX5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rd/3IrB17klb+Ksj--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/