Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sat, 08 Jun 2002 16:04:07 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets"

You guys we have SNMP statistics for these events, there
is no reason to have them per-socket. You cannot convince
me that when you are diagnosing a problem the SNMP stats
are not enough to show you if the packets are being dropped.

If not, this means we need to add more SNMP events, that is
all it means.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: PCI DMA to small buffers on cache-incoherent arch"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: [PATCH] Futex Asynchronous Interface"
Next in thread: David S. Miller: "Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets"
Reply: David S. Miller: "Re: RFC: per-socket statistics on received/dropped packets"