Re: 2.5.20 RAID5 compile error

[Martin Dalecki]

Jens Axboe wrote:
> Neil,
> 
> I tried converting umem to see how it fit together, this is what I came
> up with. This does use a queue per umem unit, but I think that's the
> right split anyways. Maybe at some point we can use the per-major
> statically allocated queues...

>  
>  /*
> + * remove the queue from the plugged list, if present. called with
> + * queue lock held and interrupts disabled.
> + */
> +inline int blk_remove_plug(request_queue_t *q)

Jens - I have noticed some unlikely() tag "optimizations" in
tcq code too.
Please tell my, why do you attribute this exported function as inline?
I "hardly doubt" that it will ever show up on any profile.
Contrary to popular school generally it only pays out to unroll vector code
on modern CPUs not decision code like the above.