Re: [PATCH] 2.5.19 IDE 78

[Martin Dalecki]

Paul Mackerras wrote:
>>>>-	OUT_BYTE(drive->ctl | 2, IDE_CONTROL_REG);
>>>>+	ata_irq_enale(drive, 0);
>>>
>>For sure not. The nIEN bit is *negated* on the part of the
>>device - please look at the ata_irq_enable() functions definition.
>>I have explained it there.
> 
> 
> Martin, that's a bit of your patch I was quoting.  I was just trying
> to point out that you wrote "ata_irq_enale" instead of "ata_irq_enable".

Yeep I realized and it's fixed in 82.