Re: forget_pte()

[William Lee Irwin III]

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:04:03PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Hmm... it's only used in two places, and the name is entirely
> misleading.  I think it might be neater to replace those two
> occurances with:
> 
> 	/* PTEs must be unmapped */
> 	BUG_ON(!pte_none(pte));
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

I'll send a patch replacing it with that open-coded at the call sites
in short order, then.