We'll discuss that on the RTAI mailing list.
> Well, I find it misleading. It makes it sound like you have rights to that
> code that you don't and it makes it sound like it is LGPLed.
You are right, and be sure we'll do our best to clarify the situation as
good as possible. Take into account that the license change took place just
recently and there are surely things left which have to be cleaned up. It
is common agreement between the RTAI team that patches and schedulers are
GPL, self-developed services are LGPL.
Sidenote: before the 24.1.9 release we publically asked on the RTAI mailing
list if we have missed somebody in the "authors" file:
http://www.realtimelinux.org/archives/rtai/20024/0066.html
Nobody has spoken up who is not listed there so far.
Robert
-- +--------------------------------------------------------+ | Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de | | Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry | | Braunschweiger Str. 79, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany | | Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4 | +--------------------------------------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/