Re: patent on O_ATOMICLOOKUP [Re: [PATCH] loopable tmpfs (2.4.17)]

Larry McVoy (lm@bitmover.com)
Sat, 25 May 2002 11:02:08 -0700

On Sat, May 25, 2002 at 07:50:30PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I do like it very much when all code I write is GPLed, but there are
> situations where a there are good reasons for some application code
> to remain closed.

Yeah, like you're trying to make money. Which is fine. But if that
"application" needs to use the RT/Linux patent in order to work, it
either has to buy a license or be GPLed.

It's somewhat two faced that the protesters here are arguing that
everything has to be free in order for Linux to be used as a RT platform,
but then come back and complain that the FSMlabs patent says everything
has to be free if you don't want to pay.

Maybe Victor should have used a different model: if no money changes hands,
then it's free to use the patent, if money changes hand, FSMlabs wants a
cut. I think that was the intent, but as with all things, it's hard to
state that clearly in a legal document. If that was the intent, I support
it, I think it's perfectly reasonable. 

-- 

---
Larry McVoy            	 lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitmover.com/lm 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/