Re: [rfc,patch] breaking up sched.h

Tim Schmielau (tim@physik3.uni-rostock.de)
Fri, 24 May 2002 23:07:25 +0200 (CEST)


[lkml: sorry for double posting by mistake]

On Fri, 24 May 2002, Russell King wrote:

> The problem with linux/irq.h is that it makes many assumptions about the
> per-architecture irq code. If anyone needs to include it (in its current
> form), then they're accessing architecture private data that may or may
> not be present.
>
> Maybe the correct thing would be to move linux/irq.h to linux/hw_irq.h
> (so it matches asm/hw_irq.h) and move request_irq() and friends into a
> new linux/irq.h

Thank you.
I will do so in the sched.h cleanup patches that my heavy
grepping will result in (I hope).

Tim

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/