Re: Linux crypto?

Thomas 'Dent' Mirlacher (dent@cosy.sbg.ac.at)
Fri, 24 May 2002 20:30:57 +0200 (MET DST)


On Fri, 24 May 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> > > They won't let me (or any other US citizen) make any edits to any of
> > > the ipsec sources if it were to be added to the main tree. That's
> > > unacceptable because it means that effectively I cannot maintain the
> > > networking.
> >
> > well the _big_ thing the freeswan people are afraid of, is exactly the
> > crypto laws in the us.
>
> They refuse to have a US citizen working on it. Which is reasonable given
> the historu of US law, but until the US finishes outlawing computers in
> a couple of years that is a problem.

well probably everything which isn't plain english written with a pen
on white paper would be outlawed by then ;)
... but what about having all the crypto stuff in question beeing handled
by modules (developed outside the USSA) and having the networking-related
code in the kernel - could the hooks itself be a problem?

tm

-- 
in some way i do, and in some way i don't.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/