Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Fri, 24 May 2002 16:11:35 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: negative dentries wasting ram"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: [patch] New driver for Artop [Acard] controllers."
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"

> > How much RAM do you have, and what does /proc/meminfo
> > and /proc/slabinfo say just before the explosion point?
>
> I have 1 gig - highmem (not enabled) - 900 megs.
> for what I can see, kernel can't reclaim buffers fast enough.
> ut looks better on -aa.
>

What sort of setup. I can't duplicate the problem here ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jakub Jelinek: "Re: negative dentries wasting ram"
Previous message: Vojtech Pavlik: "Re: [patch] New driver for Artop [Acard] controllers."
In reply to: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
Next in thread: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"
Reply: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: [BUG] 2.4 VM sucks. Again"