Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: IDE problem: linux-2.5.17

[Lionel Bouton]

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 07:56:34AM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 02:23:51AM +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:55:25AM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > > 
> > > If you rewrite the whole drive with zeros (or the original data) sector
> > > by sector, the uncorrectable errors will go away. I've done this to my
> > > 307030 and it works fine again. (Fortunately for me the errors were only
> > > in my swap partition).
> > > 
> > 
> > Don't know for the whole drive yet (currently running) but when I did a mkraid
> > on a raid5 array using 4 partitions on the same drive the sync thread ended
> > and left the array in degraded mode after a bunch of :
> > May 24 02:05:06 twins kernel: hdd: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
> > May 24 02:05:06 twins kernel: hdd: dma_intr: error=0x40 { UncorrectableError }, LBA sect=2097375, sector=2097298
> > May 24 02:05:06 twins kernel: end_request: I/O error, dev 16:41 (hdd), sector 2097298
> > 
> > Then I tried to zero the offending sectors with a slight margin :
> > [root@twins root]# dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd1 count=200 bs=512 seek=2097200
> > dd: writing /dev/hdd1': Erreur d'entrée/sortie
> > 113+0 enregistrements lus.
> > 112+0 enregistrements écrits.
> > 
> > Same error each time, seems sector 2097312 is not my friend.
> > 
> > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hdd bs=<cylinder_size> running.
> > 
> > Too bad lsof doesn't show offsets...
> > I can't tell if dd passed the offending sector :-|
> 
> Well, if writing failed, it means the drive has ran out of relocatable
> sectors. That's too bad ... best to send it in for replacement.
> 

Guarantee expired.
But...

The dd on the whole disk was successful!
Now I really wonder how IBM drives handle my data.

This drive ss now splitted in 4 partitions with a RAID5 array built on top.
BTW the raid5 sync was succesful.
If badblocks bring their ugly head again I've one more chance to move
the data out. Glad I don't need much throughput...

I've 2 other drives that are waiting such a treatment. The data I can
get on the first should be safe in a couple of hours. If someone
curious wants me to make tests on them, feel free to ask as I don't have any
insight on what to test to get a clear picture.

LB.