Re: [PATCH] 2.5.17 IDE 67
Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Wed, 22 May 2002 10:31:37 -0700
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 06:21:10PM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Uz.ytkownik Tom Rini napisa?:
> >On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 09:19:07AM +0200, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Wed May 22 01:43:54 CEST 2002 ide-clean-67
> >>
> >>- Nuke COMMERIAL and similar spurious configuration options...
> >> The fact that every single default configuration option contained
> >> those bits makes this trivial patch appear rather big.
> >
> >
> >This also nukes CONFIG_DMA_NONPCI. While this probably shouldn't have
> >been define_bool'ed to 'n' all of the time, there are cases where this
> >seems to be properly used. I know PPC4xx uses it (or will be using it
> >once the driver is ready to be submitted) and it looks like cris uses it
> >as well.
>
> No I checked. PPC4xx had no functional code for the case
> of CONFIG_DMA_NONPCI. It just looked like it had.
You checked the kernel.org tree, not the PPC tree.
> Look at the patch and see that it is removing the two
> nonpci_xxx functions which are nowhere defined!
Because the driver isn't quite ready to be submitted just yet.
> The __CRIS__ behaviour is preserved and BTW.
> not pretty as well.
> But this can be fixed a bit later...
And when the PPC4xx drivers are ready to be submitted we'll need to add
in __powerpc__ tests too. Can't we just keep CONFIG_DMA_NONPCI for now?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/