Re: Initialisation bug in IDE patch

[Andre Hedrick]

First question for 2.2.X, in your .config is "CONFIG_BLK_DEV_QD6580" set ?
If not then ide0=qd6580 will yield "-- BAD OPTION"

Second question for 2.4.X in your .config is "CONFIG_BLK_DEV_QD65XX" set ?
If not then ide0=qd65xx will yield "-- BAD OPTION"

Please check those first.

Cheers,

On Wed, 22 May 2002, Andrew Pam wrote:

> On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 11:18:56PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> > Now you have me puzzled........
> > If "ide_setup" which parses the passed settings calls "init_ide_data"
> > which initalizes all "hwif" groups and sets a cookie to prevent "ide_init"
> > from re-initalizing thus purging the contents place in by "ide_setup", how
> > are you getting a "BAD -- OPTION"?
> 
> Off the top of my head, it looks like ide_init_default_hwifs creates
> an uninitialised "hw_regs_t hw;" variable, fills in some fields, then
> calls "ide_register_hw(&hw, NULL);" which does "memcpy(&hwif->hw, hw,
> sizeof(*hw));" thus copying the unitialised fields (such as "chipset")
> right over the area zeroed by init_ide_data().
> 
> Am I on the right track?
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Andrew Pam
> -- 
> mailto:[e-mail]                         Andrew Pam
> http://www.xanadu.com.au/                       Chief Scientist, Xanadu
> http://www.glasswings.com.au/                   Technology Manager, Glass Wings
> http://www.sericyb.com.au/                      Manager, Serious Cybernetics
> http://two-cents-worth.com/?105347&EG		Donate two cents to our work!
> P.O. Box 477, Blackburn VIC 3130 Australia	Phone [phone]
> 

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group