linux-2.4.19-p7 ide.c
static void init_hwif_data (unsigned int index)
{
unsigned int unit;
hw_regs_t hw;
ide_hwif_t *hwif = &ide_hwifs[index];
/* bulk initialize hwif & drive info with zeros */
memset(hwif, 0, sizeof(ide_hwif_t));
memset(&hw, 0, sizeof(hw_regs_t));
/* fill in any non-zero initial values */
hwif->index = index;
ide_init_hwif_ports(&hw, ide_default_io_base(index), 0, &hwif->irq);
memcpy(&hwif->hw, &hw, sizeof(hw));
memcpy(hwif->io_ports, hw.io_ports, sizeof(hw.io_ports));
hwif->noprobe = !hwif->io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET];
Obviously you are calling things outside of the normal usage of the
driver.
2.2.19 ide.c
/*
* Do not even *think* about calling this!
*/
static void init_hwif_data (unsigned int index)
{
unsigned int unit;
hw_regs_t hw;
ide_hwif_t *hwif = &ide_hwifs[index];
/* bulk initialize hwif & drive info with zeros */
memset(hwif, 0, sizeof(ide_hwif_t));
memset(&hw, 0, sizeof(hw_regs_t));
/* fill in any non-zero initial values */
hwif->index = index;
ide_init_hwif_ports(&hw, ide_default_io_base(index), 0, &hwif->irq);
memcpy(&hwif->hw, &hw, sizeof(hw));
memcpy(hwif->io_ports, hw.io_ports, sizeof(hw.io_ports));
hwif->noprobe = !hwif->io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET];
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_HD
if (hwif->io_ports[IDE_DATA_OFFSET] == HD_DATA)
If you are attempting to introduce a hw.chipset which is unknown to the
driver please submit a patch to register it or the enum index will barf.
Cheers,
On Wed, 22 May 2002, Andrew Pam wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:15:10PM +1000, Andrew Pam wrote:
> > In the latest available kernel 2.2 IDE patch "ide-2.2.20.01102002.patch"
> > there is a bug that prevents ide_setup in drivers/block/ide.c
> > from accepting kernel parameters selecting special IDE hardware.
> >
> > The ide_init_default_hwifs() function in include/asm-*/ide.h fails to
> > initialise the "hw_regs_t hw" variable, thus leaving uninitialised data
> > in some fields. Specifically, the "chipset" field is uninitialised which
> > causes the "if (hwif->chipset != ide_unknown)" test in drivers/block/ide.c
> > to always fail with the error message " -- BAD OPTION".
>
> This bug also appears to be present in the mainline 2.4 kernel IDE code.
> I haven't checked the 2.5 code yet.
>
> Regards,
> Andrew Pam
> --
> mailto:xanni@xanadu.net Andrew Pam
> http://www.xanadu.com.au/ Chief Scientist, Xanadu
> http://www.glasswings.com.au/ Technology Manager, Glass Wings
> http://www.sericyb.com.au/ Manager, Serious Cybernetics
> http://two-cents-worth.com/?105347&EG Donate two cents to our work!
> P.O. Box 477, Blackburn VIC 3130 Australia Phone +61 401 258 915
>
Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/