Re: [PATCH] Fix BUG macro

[Hugh Dickins]

On Fri, 17 May 2002, Rusty Russell wrote:
> 
> I don't care about the size of the kernel, I care about the fact that
> the compile is 5x slower than it needs to be because the contents of
> every pre-processed file depends on where the kernel tree happens to
> be (see http://ccache.samba.org)

All power to you, speeding up your (and others') builds.  All power
to you, eliminating the absolute pathnames (which I abhor for making
comparisons harder).  But some do care about the size of the kernel
too: your additional __FUNCTION__ hurts them and doesn't help you.

Hugh