The load average includes I/O waiting. So that may well mean you have 14
different processes waiting for the card.
> even faster than this Ultra-160 SCSI i960 RAID with 32MB cache. If this
> is the case, I will just throw it away and use my onboard Ultra-160
> connector with software RAID which runs faster(at least). This is almost
> unusable for even small workgroup server.
The numbers seem extremely poor. There are plenty of abysmally slow
RAID controllers out there but I'd expect bettere than 1810K/second even
on things like old Megaraid cards.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/