> > size when checking locally with `ls' (the clients reported total
> > success). With `asynch' instead, all files were correctly copied.
>
> How are you mounting the file systems on the clients?
> The symptoms sound exactly like you are using "soft" mounts. "soft"
> is a very bad mount option. Use "hard".
>
> If you aren't using "soft", let me know and I will look harder.
Errrm, I am using "soft" mounts, as I (we) want the clients to survive
server restarts.
But shouldn't those timeouts become errors over at the clients?
/Sverker
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/