*boggle* $deity knows how.
I just checked. From a clean 2.4.14, with -dj2 patch applied, that
segment of code reads..
#if SUPPORT_SLOW_DATA_PORTS
if (drive->channel->slow)
ata_write_slow(drive, buffer, wcount);
else
#endif
ata_write_16(drive, buffer, wcount);
}
So this part..
> > > - ata_write_16(drive, buffer, wcount<<1);
> > > + ata_write_16(drive, buffer, wcount);
Should reject (or at least say already applied)
It may be patch(1) being funky, and doing something silly like adding the
same patch twice (something thats bitten me a few times, and has also happened
in Linus' tree once or twice).
Dave.
-- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/