>
> On Fri, 10 May 2002, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > No problems, except for putting exports in inode.c. ISTR Linus saying that
> > additional files with exports seriously increase the build time... Linus?
>
> A few additional ones are fine - especially for "core" stuff like inode.c
> I don't see any problem at all.
>
> And keeping EXPORT_SYMBOL close to the place that defines it makes some
> things clearer. I would certainly not mind moving some of the
> kernel/ksym.c stuff out to the places that actually define the functions.
>
> If it becomes an issue where _most_ files in export symbols, our build
> times will suck, but fs/inode.c is certainly central enough that I don't
> find any problem with it.
OK. BTW, would you accept ->getattr() patchset if I start to feed it to
you today?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/