Re: kbuild 2.5 is ready for inclusion in the 2.5 kernel

[Alan Cox]

> >- I think looking for kgcc before gcc is a bad idea. If you really
> >want something like that, make it look for kgcc-2.5 instead.
> 
> That came from one of the -ac trees.  No matter which order I use,
> somebody will want a different order and complain.  At least kbuild 2.5
> tells you what it is using, instead of silently defaulting to an
> unexpected value.

For 2.2 - for 2.4 using kgcc generally gets you egcs-1.1.2 which tends
to be a bad idea, and for 2.5 its a no go. I'd drop the kgcc search.

Alan