> On Mon, May 06 2002, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > At 06:55 06/05/02, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > >On Sun, May 05 2002, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> > >> Note even with that fix IDE (at least TCQ) is really easy to crash when
> > >you
> > >> put the system under heavier I/O (at least on my via box)...
> > >
> > >If you have stumpled upon a tcq bug, I'd like to know more about it.
> >
> > Back trace (sorry didn't have ckermit running so didn't catch the whole
> > output and was too lazy to write it all down): blk_queue_invalidate_tags,
> > tcq_invalidate_queue, ide_dmaq_complete, ide_dmaq_intr, ata_irq_request,
> > ide_dmaq_intr, handle_IRQ_event, do_IRQ, ideprobe_init.
>
> Same problem as Sebastian I'm sure, in which case the backtrace holds no
> info for me, the IDE messages printed _before_ the panic would be
> helpful though :-)
Ok here they are (or do you mean the ide initialisation?):
[normal stuff]
ide_tcq_intr_timeout: timeout waiting for service interrupt...
ide_tcq_intr_timeout: hwgroup not busy
hda: invalidating pending queue (10)
kernel BUG at ll_rw_blk.c:407!
[panic]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/