Re: [PATCH] alternative API for raw devices

[H. Peter Anvin]

Followup to:  <[e-mail]>
By author:    Alexander Viro <[e-mail]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> 	* it's _not_ a character device - stat() will give you S_IFREG.
> 	  To check that <foo> is a new-style raw device call statfs(2) and
> 	  compare .f_type with rawfs magic (0x726177).  It doesn't conflict
> 	  with existing check for raw devices (stat(), check that it's
> 	  a character device and compare major with RAW_MAJOR), so existing
> 	  software can be taught to check for raw devices in
> 	  backwards-compatible way.
> 

I really don't know if it's a good idea for this to be S_IFREG, which
software has a reasonable expecation to behave like a normal file,
which a raw device *definitely* doesn't.

I would really like things like this as well as a lot of the
zero-length magic files in /proc to be S_ISCHR with i_rdev ==
MK_DEV(0,0) (the latter to let user space know that this isn't a
standard device node.)

	-hpa
-- 
<[e-mail]> at work, <[e-mail]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<[e-mail]>