> The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about
> a non essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.
well, this raises an interesting point...
should documentation be regarded as part of the package it documents or
not?
is this 'bitkeeper documentation', 'documentation about bitkeeper', or
'linux kernel documentation', or what?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/