Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 20:15:53 +0200
On Sunday 21 April 2002 20:08, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 07:48:44PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Plus, the url saves download
> > bandwidth. A compelling argument I'd say.
>
> The docs are all of 12K, I just went and looked. If you care about
> bandwidth, you'd be arguing in favor of BK, it saves tons of bandwidth
> compared to diff and patch.
All you said is 'it doesn't waste *that* much bandwidth'. Remember, this is
the place we spend days arguing over a cycle or two.
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/