Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:11:55 +0200

On Sunday 21 April 2002 18:57, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2002 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > Let's pull back a little from the proselytizing, shall we? I'll modify
> > my proposal to 'include just a pointer to the bk documentation in the
> > kernel tree itself'. This should satisfy everybody.
>
> No, it doesn't. It was put into the tree for convenience.

How much less convenient is it to click on a link? So much harder that it's
worth pissing off some key developers?

> It therefore stands to reason that removing it creates inconvenience.
> Further, the only reason to remove it is ideology. i.e. something
> other than technical merit. So your proposal is still a no-go.

According to you, yes. I'll leave it on the table.

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/