Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 03:57:59AM +0100, Ian Molton escreveu:
> Russell King Awoke this dragon, who will now respond:
> > But no, in your eyes, I'm just another stupid BK person who's
> > contributing to the downfall of Linux, and is in the "in" club.
> 
> I dont think Daniel claimed BK was contributing to linux downfall.
> 
> He said that having proprietary stuff in the kernel was a bad idea.
> 
> We dont allow proprietary modules in the kernel, why should docs be any
> different?

The documentation being discussed is not proprietary, it only talks about a non
essential proprietary tool used now by lots of kernel hackers.

- Arnaldo