Re: [RFC] 2.5.8 sort kernel tables

[Jamie Lokier]

Oliver Xymoron wrote:
> Though we should probably just stick a simple qsort in the library
> somewhere.

Since we're comparing sort algorithms, I am quite fond of Heapsort.
Simple, no recursion or stack, and worst case O(n log n).  It's not
especially fast, but the worst case behaviour is nice:

/* This function is a classic in-place heapsort.  It sorts the array
   `nums' of integers, which has `count' elements. */

void my_heapsort (int count, int * nums)
{
	int i;
	for (i = 1; i < count; i++) {
		int j = i, tmp = nums [j];
		while (j > 0 && tmp > nums [(j-1)/2]) {
			nums [j] = nums [(j-1)/2];
			j = (j-1)/2;
		}
		nums [j] = tmp;
	}
	for (i = count - 1; i > 0; i--) {
		int j = 0, k = 1, tmp = nums [i];
		nums [i] = nums [0];
		while (k < i && (tmp < nums [k]
				 || (k+1 < i && tmp < nums [k+1]))) {
			k += (k+1 < i && nums [k+1] > nums [k]);
			nums [j] = nums [k];
			j = k;
			k = 2*j+1;
		}
		nums [j] = tmp;
	}
}

cheers,
-- Jamie