Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ?

[Mark Mielke]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:32:25PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Mark Mielke wrote:
> > Increasing the HZ can only improve responsiveness, however, there is a
> > cost (mentioned by others). The cost is that the scheduler is executed
> > more often per second. If the scheduler does the same amount of work
> > per tick, but there are more ticks per second, the scheduler does more
> > work overall, and the CPU is free for use by the processes less.
> Why are you discussing Linux 1.2 ?
> Linux is not running the scheduler each cpu tick and hasn't
> done this for years.

Hmm... sorry... :-) Too early in the morning...

mark

-- 
[e-mail]/[e-mail]/[e-mail] __________________________
.  .  _  ._  . .   .__    .  . ._. .__ .   . . .__  | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/    |_     |\/|  |  |_  |   |/  |_   | 
|  | | | | \ | \   |__ .  |  | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
                       and in the darkness bind them...

                           http://mark.mielke.cc/