Re: Multiple zlib.c's in 2.4.18
Tom Rini (trini@kernel.crashing.org)
Sat, 13 Apr 2002 14:27:57 -0700
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 07:42:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Further checking reveals that ./arch/ppc/boot/lib/zlib.c is based on
> > zlib-0.95, while the other two are zlib-1.0.4.
> >
> > Which one should I use? Shouldn't they be merged? And what about the
> > double-free() bug?
>
> There is progress going on to merge them (see 2.4.19-ac) so hopefully RSN
> that question won't be worth asking.
All of them that can be anyhow. I'm hoping no one will touch
arch/ppc/boot/lib/zlib.c :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/