Re: C++ and the kernel

H. Peter Anvin (hpa@zytor.com)
9 Apr 2002 18:52:19 -0700


Followup to: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1020409085537.4291B-100000@chaos.analogic.com>
By author: "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > Bollox!
> >
> > There are many places in the kernel that are actually very OO - look at
> > filesystems for example. The super_operations sturcture is in effect a
> > virtual function table.
>
> The file operations structure(s) are structures. They are not object-
> oriented in any way, and they are certainly not virtual. The code that
> manipulates them is quite physical and procedural, well defined, and
> visible to the rest of the kernel.
>

Again, bollocks. The file operation structures are vanilla vtbl
implementations of virtual functions. The fact that they're written

foo->f_ops->func(foo, ...);

instead of

foo->func(...);

makes absolutely no difference whatsoever.

-hpa

-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt	<amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/