Re: Two fixes for 2.4.19-pre5-ac3

[Alan Cox]

> But what about the recent discussion on the removal of sys_call_table ?
> 
> (I believe it was along the lines of "it's ugly, prevent it ...", "ah,
> but it has real uses, so why can't it stay as deprecated/unadvised ?"
> "*no response*").
> 
> I'm a bit disappointed this has just gone in without any real discussion
> on the usefulness of this for certain circumstances :(

Removing it in the -ac tree is a good way to stimulate discussion and
fixing the code that relies on it (except for the 99% of code relying on it
which is cracker authored trojans)