> In article <Pine.LNX.4.30.0204050220590.7535-100000@elin.scali.no> you wrote:
> > Then it's a bit odd that RH ships a new kernel-headers RPM (which
> > contains the /usr/include/{linux,asm} directories) for each kernel
> > update and glibc still beeing the same, isn't it ?
>
> Yes it is; and we fixed that properly in the current beta. But note
> that the updates are minor anyway (between errata the headers don't
> actually change in general); and people complain loudly when I exclude the
> kernel-headers package.....
Wouldn't it be more logical to have the kernel-headers stuff inside the
glibc-devel package (I guess you have thought about this already...). Why
do people complain if you remove the kernel-headers package ?
Regards,
-- Steffen Persvold | Scalable Linux Systems | Try out the world's best mailto:sp@scali.com | http://www.scali.com | performing MPI implementation: Tel: (+47) 2262 8950 | Olaf Helsets vei 6 | - ScaMPI 1.13.8 - Fax: (+47) 2262 8951 | N0621 Oslo, NORWAY | >320MBytes/s and <4uS latency- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/