Re: [PATCH 2.5.5] do export vmalloc_to_page to modules...

[Alan Cox]

> There should be no "licensing implications" but simply the (documented)
> fact that if a proprietary module writer is stupid enough to make a
> MODULE_SYMBOLS_INTERNAL claim his module will break far more often both
> with respect to existence _and_ semantics/implemention of those entries

Using any internals of the Linux kernel has licensing implications. 

> exported only "internally". But that is their own problem -- we should
> neither help them nor prevent them from doing their work and earning their

So why are you trying to put me out of business by allowing people to use
my code in ways the GPL doesn't permit. That cuts both ways.