RE: Char devices drivers

Ed Vance (EdV@macrolink.com)
Mon, 1 Apr 2002 12:55:16 -0800


On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 1:40 PM, David Lawyer wrote:
>
> So eliminating cua means more work for the programmer but less
> confusion for users. Overall, it's a good thing since there
> are many more users than programmers.

Agreed, mostly. My experience is that users prefer system
functionality that is accessible from a shell script, rather than
requiring a source change to their app. The cua method, be it ever
so broken on some platforms, is directly usable without programming
to solve the most common issue - how do I get my app to talk to my
3-wire RS-232 ports.

Good to hear from you again.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Ed Vance edv@macrolink.com
Macrolink, Inc. 1500 N. Kellogg Dr Anaheim, CA 92807
----------------------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/