Re: readv() return and errno

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 26 Mar 2002 23:40:47 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.18] Security: Process-Killer if machine get's out of memory"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: readv() return and errno"

> The above ERRORS section says: In case this call returns EINVAL
> one of the possible reasons is that an invalid argument was given.
> There do exist Unix-like systems (not necessarily Linux) that
> consider a zero count invalid.

Got me as well - by that meaning you are correct - the man page is only
wrong for ssize_t type stuff.

Sorry

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: readv() return and errno"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: [2.4.18] Security: Process-Killer if machine get's out of memory"
In reply to: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl: "Re: readv() return and errno"